Labels

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

PITCH

 
Jake - I think the pitch went quite well. We got across most, if not all, of our ideas for the story and our research and hopeful certificate. We should've planned out who speaks when and added some images onto the presentation to make it a bit more interesting, but overall, it went okay. 

 Lewis - In my opinion the pitch went very well. i fell that we manages to clearly get across the majority of the information a bought the film, however we were not as clear on some aspects like the opening credits as we could have been.

Sunday, 13 November 2011

Jake Cornes Title Research 1


The opening reveals institutional information such as the actors, directors, producers, writers and that it is made by HBO. It is presented over images and videos of the south of america and vampire related imagery. We see children eating very juicy tomatoes(?) and a lot of references to christianity, and the audience can tell it's the south as some of the images are recognizable and the south is linked with christianity quite strongly. The children eating tomatoes looks like blood, vampires drink blood, ipso facto, the child looks like a vampire. It's a good example of how images can be used that don't directly relate to the genre but have some relevance to make a good intro. Problem is though, this is more suited for a television series then a movie as a movie would probably say more institutional information and would only be on once so perhaps would contain quite as many actors, as they would be left for the closing credits.

Monday, 7 November 2011

Media assesment piece review. Lewis

I do think that our finished work shows a good level of camera ability. All of our shots were steady and were not shaky or rough, this includes the pans that i feel are very smooth although they copuld be better. The framing of our shots was also quite good with most shots having appropriate cut off points, space above characters heads and walking room. however we did not appropriatly use the rule of thirds. We only applied this rule to about half the shots we should have and this makes it much less interesting to watch and hindered our composition.
The camera work was done well especially as our location turned out to be too thin. These limitations caused us to have to improvise with the long shots and side views. We did despite the limitations manage to fit in every shot type except eyeline match as it was not appropriate for our selected scene.
The major problem that we encountered was the exposure, we failed to take in to account the fact that once tanken off the camera the footage would become much darker. This made  our film consistantly too dark, making many shots hard to see and many details hard to notice.

I feel that overall the editing was done well. The shots go together well creating a good consistant and easy to follw film, there were no noticable jumps annd a natural flow of shots. Our main flaw on the editing side was our failiure to add transitions between shots, i feel that the use of fades and other transitions would have helped the changing of shot be less harsh and better overall looking. Our film did not suffer too much due to this however it wopuld have been an improvement. This failiure was caused by a organisational problem leading to less editing time than expected.

In our project we did use appropriate props and clothing, with our vampire having fake teeth and makeup to cause a pale look with blood around the mouth. However this work is undone due to the failiure to get a good exposure meaning that it is quite difficult to notice these features.
The location for our filming fit the genra nicely as a dark abandoned alley at night, however in terms of shooting it was not optimal due to beeing too small for our long shots from the side.

My role in the group was to do the main part of the filming and also some editing. I handled the camera most out of my group, i also contributed to the editing by cutting up shots helping to order them and fixing shots to match the origional piece. Me and my partner both did equal amounts of planning in aadvanced.
If we could re-shoot our film i would definitly correct the exposure problems and make sure our filming was bright enough as it is easy to darken a shot to the desired level but almost impossible to brighten it. I would also makesure we had enough time to fully finish the editing with time to watch through checking for faults.

For our final coursework i would be much more organised leaving plenty of room for unforseen error correction. This would give us the chance to fully check our film and get outside opinions, and even the chance to reshoot sections if nessercerry.

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

My assessment of the Assignment - Jake

I feel the movie went quite well. We got the correct shots and held them sufficiently. We used a variety of shots, though we could have had more. A few of the shots were too close but overall they were okay. All the shots flowed together thanks to the continuity editing. We sadly forgot to add the fades in the first few shots which does make it differ quite a bit from the original.

We had to change actor so the original actor search pictures aren't of the actor we used but we replicated the same clothing and make up, though the make up is quite hard to see in the light. The location was a bit too tight to get the long shots so we used another location which was close by.

I drew out the storyboard and did all the makeup. I also edited quite a lot of the film together. I filmed a little bit but not much as Lewis is better behind a camera than I am. If I were to make improvements, I would make sure to add the fades and the effect of the camera shaking. I would also have chosen a slightly larger location.